Roberts Banks on Good Looks, Not Past Decisions
A NY Times article reports that "Court Nominee Says Early Career Is No Guide." So, should the Senate affirm Roberts because of his boyish good looks? I mean, if his past decisions are no guide to what he will do in office, then what is?
(Disclaimer: this is what one would call sarcastic. I do understand what the judge was truly saying, and though Roberts is probably not who I'd nominate were I president - hey, I really like Judge Judy - I do think he should be affirmed.)
posted by Eli7 @ 4:06 PM
4 comments
4 Comments:
Not sure if you've been following but you have no idea how many senators said that he should be confirmed just for his good physical appearance and health. It's all a show; he's not answering anything substantial and presidential wannabees (Biden, Brownback etc) are playing tough-guy (girl, for DiFi) so they get some airtime on the nightly news.
The whole thing is a sham. A Senator actually asked him if Congress has the right to declare war. He responded, "well the Constitution give them that power...." What was that, a test?
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
This is just a dog and pony show.
Post a Comment
<< Home